Royals

Prince Harry ‘Will Always Be Vulnerable’ to Security Threats Amid Recent Stalker Nightmares

Mark McGarry

Published

on

ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA

Prince Harry has reportedly had two close calls with a stalker — including one incident where the so-called perpetrator nearly got within an arm’s reach of the Duke of Sussex.

Even worse, Harry’s nightmare comes at a time when he’s desperately trying to reinstate his royal protection, which was stripped away when he and wife Meghan Markle walked away from their royal duties.

Getty Images

According to reports by The Telegraph, the female stalker managed to infiltrate a “secure zone” inside London’s Royal Lancaster Hotel on Sept. 7 when Harry was there, and she was reportedly found hiding in a hotel bathroom uttering “odd comments” about the 40-year-old prince less than 30 minutes before he arrived for the WellChild Awards.

Two days later, the woman reportedly got within yards of Harry when he paid a visit to the Centre for Blast Injury Studies at Imperial College in West London. She was thwarted from getting even closer when a member of Harry’s staff supposedly recognized her and bravely “body-blocked” the woman.

Archewell

The woman apparently has also written letters to Harry, 41, and Meghan, 44, and is rumored to be on a list of potential dangers to their children, Prince Archie, 6, and Princess Lilibet, 4, and other royals.

Now living in Montecito, Calif., Harry and Meghan pay bodyguards out of their own pockets for protection.

“Given these incidents, it’s no wonder Harry is so concerned about security,” confides a source. “He fought to have his security paid for in the U.K. — and lost — but that doesn’t mean he’ll be walking around unprotected. There will always be layers of security surrounding the prince, whether he’s alone or with Meghan.”

Since 2020, Harry has been in court battling to have his taxpayer-funded state security reinstated, claiming he can’t provide the same level of protection to his family on his own.

MEGA

In May, he lost his latest appeal to reinstate state-funded security and told the BBC that he can’t see a world in which he could safely bring Meghan and their children back to Britain.

“If there comes a time when the pair need to save money, it won’t be on security,” the source reveals. “They’ve made it known that security is the most important thing to them, because it involves the safety of their family.”

“When Meghan sees reports that a stalker may have gotten close to Harry, it must be very upsetting,” adds the source. “No matter how much security they have, Harry and Meghan will always be vulnerable to an extent.”

Trending News

Royals4 days ago

Prince William Demands Prince Harry Keep Princess Kate and Their Children ‘Off-Limits’ in Talks

Exclusive4 days ago

Meghan Markle Tells Prince Harry ‘They Don’t Need His Family’ Amid Radio Silence From King Charles

Exclusive4 days ago

Jennifer Aniston’s Glam Squad Gives Boyfriend Jim Curtis a ‘Mid-2000s George Clooney’ Makeover

Celebrity News3 days ago

Paul McCartney Claims He Remembers Being Born, Describes ‘Hygienic’ Wall Tiles and ‘Chrome Instruments’

Nostalgia3 days ago

Original ‘Willy Wonka’ Oompa Loompa Reveals Disgusting Secret Behind the Movie’s Famous Chocolate River

Exclusive7 days ago

Ex-Prince Andrew Finds an Unlikely Ally in Queen Camilla: ‘Definitely Softened Towards Him’

Celebrity News5 days ago

Billy Crystal Doesn’t ‘Trust’ God Anymore Following Rob Reiner’s Death and the Loss of His Home to Fire

Celebrity News2 days ago

Joni Mitchell’s U.S. Citizenship at 82 Divides Fans: ‘So Incredibly Disappointed’

Celebrity News4 days ago

William Shatner Reveals He Sold His Kidney Stone for $75K: Thank God It’s Gone’

Exclusive3 days ago

Michael Douglas to Leave $400 Million Fortune to Wife Catherine Zeta-Jones: ‘Can’t Take It With You’

Chuck Lorre Chuck Lorre
Celebrity News2 days ago

Chuck Lorre Cautions That Societies That Abandon God Risk Adopting Extreme Ideologies

Exclusive19 hours ago

Michael J. Fox Is ‘Having a Rough Time’ Amid Parkinson’s Battle But ‘Refuses’ to Lose ‘Optimism’